Pretty self-explanatory. Tomorrow I’ll be flying back to my college, moving in, and taking care of some last-minute stuff. That means I won’t be able to comment on your blogs as often as I would like to. However, I will return your comments once everything settles down so rest assured. Speaking of comments, there won’t be anything worth commenting on for entry. Guess I’ll be disabling the commenting system for this entry only. Of course you could still comment on my previous ones and the future ones. Anyways, take care!
Mini-Hiatus!!!
Sunday 22nd August, 2010 - 5:24pm
Posted in School | Comments Off
It’s those little things that count.
Friday 20th August, 2010 - 4:25pm
Last night, my friends and I hung out for the one last time before returning to college. We ended our night with with a trip to the movie theater watching The Expendables. Although I won’t spoil the plot, I will say that I thought to myself that the movie was not worth the watch for the first half of the movie. Things got more interesting toward the end so it’s passable. After we left the theater, my friends were talking about the movie like everyone else were. Now since I’m normally “the quiet one” in the group, I am the one who listens to what others have to say and not my opinion unless it’s really necessary. After everyone else expressed their opinions, one friend asked me what I thought of the movie. I, being the honest friend I am, said that it was “kind of boring and really wasn’t worth the watch unless one had the patience to sit through it”…Or so I would’ve said had another friend not interrupted me after my saying the phrase “worth the watch.” This another friend said that such reaction is expected since I’m just a girl. He continued with something like how girls would be bored by excessive action and lack of drama/romance.
Before I go any further, I would like to point out that this is not a complaint entry in response to his [this another friend] statement. This entry does, however, point out how it’s the accumulation of tolerance of subtle gender inequalities that “grow” into something bigger. It also allows me to revisit the whole concept of what being a feminist is all about. Be warned: what I’m about to say might not be what you’re expecting to read. I suspect that my views might come out to be a little cold and harsh. However, I will not use any profanity so rest assured.
As far as I know, there is no objectively correct way of being a feminist. If you believe that women are equal to men in every – except biological – aspect and advocate equal treatment regardless of gender, then you are a feminist. Then again, that’s how others see it. I, on the other hand, will go even further and define feminism as acknowledgment of equality in every – again, except biological – aspect regardless of sex. Note that I didn’t say gender for there is a slight difference between sex and gender. Sex is biologically defined whereas gender is socially defined. Therefore, I will refer “women” as females and “men” as males to help make things universally easier. Believe me, there are places that don’t classify gender the way the westerners do.
Going back to what my friend said about how I’m just a girl, he excused my boredom just because I’m “a girl” and that it’s expected for “a girl” to be more into drama and romance and everything else in between. Why though? Is it really because only we females are “programmed” to love that sort of thing? After all, the society finds it acceptable for females to react emotionally when watching a romantic movie and give a slightly-bored – or even better, appalled – reaction in response to a more action/physical movie. On the contrary, it is considered more “normal” for the males to be excited in response to action and suppress their own feelings in response to more sentimental genres. I guess this is why he expected for me to find The Expendables to be boring [at first] which isn’t the case. I won’t get into too much details, but the main reason I was slightly disappointed is because it was a little overdone by my standards. That’s all there is to it. But since I’m a girl, it just had to be because it was *exaggeration* all action and no plot *end exaggeration* right?
The aforementioned experience serves as a good example of how subtle inequality builds up to something even bigger: gender inequality. As mentioned, it was “understandable” for me to not find the entire movie exciting. But when a male says the same thing, he’s “at risk of losing his manhood.” Where did I get that? I overheard some random guy saying that to one of his male friends who had the similar reaction to the movie as mine. See the difference in the expectation? If so, I guess there’s no need for me to talk about my work experience then. I’m sure quite a few of you would agree: females are typically treated a little more leniently than males are. In the short run, we females enjoy the luxury of convenience and forgiveness. However in the long run, we are seen as a group of people who are to be treated with less expectations, thus seen as “less” than our male counterparts.
What’s sad is that, the way I see it, quite a few self-appointed feminists want to retain the feminine behaviors and treatments while fighting for equality. As nice as it sounds, I find that to be simply impossible. What they fail to see is that some of those nice treatments that we are getting are due to gender inequality. How do we know if those treatments or expectations are sources of inequality? Easy: if it is considered “abnormal” for our male counterparts to request those same treatments that are considered “normal” for females to receive.
This is where things get a little extreme: in order to truly attain equality, we might have to renounce some of the luxuries that we’re currently enjoying. Here’s a good example: clothing. It is totally acceptable for females to wear relatively more revealing attires for casual wear – i.e. short shorts – while males…not so much. [Sports attires are excluded.] In formal events, there are multiple designs of dresses for “women”. Although there are minor detailed differences in “men’s” formal attires, the overall design is more similar. The major difference between the males and females is that with females, it’s all about how they’re “decorated”. Just look at the make-up, hair, accessories, and of course dresses. Males don’t have much option because “they don’t need to worry about it too much“.
Long-story short, get rid of this gender-divided fashion. That means it’s whether we deem these attires acceptable for for everyone to wear or just get rid of such attires altogether. Told you this entry is going to be harsh. After all, wouldn’t it be unreasonable of us females to fight for “equality” while retaining some those luxurious [discriminatory] treatment we get? If we want equality, we have to take one small step at a time. In the end, it’s those little things that count.
Posted in Friends, Ideas | 13 Comments »
A special right? How ironic…
Sunday 15th August, 2010 - 12:58am
What is marriage exactly? For some, marriage is defined as a union between two people. Others would feel more comfortable if “a man and a woman” were to replace “two people.” To me, marriage is merely a legally-recognized union between two people. Note that I added the word legally because when a marriage is recognized by the legal system, the married couple receives basic benefits such as Social Security, right to inherit in case of death, joint parenting/adoption, and so on. Long-story short, I see marriage as [ideally speaking] a lifetime legal contract between two people. Now that you know where I stand definition-wise, I can finally move on to some of the common arguments I hear against gay marriage. I would like to make a disclaimer that they’re not in any particular order.
The gays shouldn’t be allowed to have this special right.
Again, the right to marry is the right to the benefits that the two [plus any additional party such as children] are to receive upon “signing” this legal contract. These rights to benefits are already given to the traditional, heterosexually married couples. In fact, right now these rights are exclusively given to the heterosexually married couples. Is it a special right? As of now, yes because it’s a special right given to the heterosexual couples. Therefore, in practical terms, this argument doesn’t make any sense.
Gay marriage is a threat to procreation.
Please do correct me if I’m wrong, but we are still dominated by heterosexuals population-wise so procreation wouldn’t be a problem. Besides, in some areas, there’s a population crisis going on. With that being the case, we could use a few homosexual couples to help balance things out…You know, but rescuing those homeless children and taking care of them through adoption. *BEGIN/Ultra-sarcasm* After all, our population is dwindling so quickly, we’re stuck with a bunch of homeless children that serve as nothing but a burden on society. *END/Ultra-sarcasm* Which reminds me, allowing gay couples to adopt children wouldn’t hurt. Since they couldn’t create their own children, it wouldn’t be surprising for them to want to adopt one. For all I know, they might be more willing to adopt children than heterosexual couples who have their own children to take care of. In fact, according to Williams Institute’s analysis, “for every child available and waiting for adoption, there are 16 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered people wanting to adopt”. If only they were granted those rights…Perhaps granting gay couples certain benefits of marriage such as joint parenting/adoption would help children find a home instead of being stuck in some foster care without being able to settle in a home.
What about the children? They won’t have a healthy life without a father and a mother.
After “thirty years of research says the same, including a new 17-year study published this month in Pediatrics, the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics, concluding that children raised by lesbian parents do better academically, are more confident than their peers and have fewer behavioral problems.” (CNN) Though this is just one research that happened to be conducted for a few decades, I can confidently say that such aforementioned myth…Is merely a myth. Since I’m not really satisfied with the amount of evidence I have presented, I will find more articles to help further refute such myth.
As of now, these are the only arguments I could think of. If you have anymore arguments that you would like to present to me, please feel free to do so.
Mini-Update on Life
I’ve spent the Friday night with three of my close friends watching Dinner for Schmucks. Overall: worth the watch. In fact, there are quite a few [literally speaking here] LOL moments. Although I suspect I’m one of the later viewers of the movie, here’s the link to view the trailer.
Here’s one sad news: this might be my last time seeing them since I’ll be flying back to my college in about a week. Of course I may be able to see them again if we arrange ourselves to meet during the weekday. We’ll see what happens. Gosh I need to start packing…Anyways good night!
Posted in Current Events, Ideas | 18 Comments »
Something to share?
Monday 9th August, 2010 - 5:44pm
Although I’m sure quite a few folks have already seen this, I still want to share this with you all.
On a side note, you may have noticed that the layout has changed once again. This time, it’s a pre-made layout [credits at the bottom]. I’m going to take my time with the WP theme. It might take me a day, a week, a month, a year, something I cannot predict. However, I will do my best. I have re-organized the contents as well.









